The current most widely accepted theory is Charles Darwin's Theory of evolution. We have been taught this claimed to be fact since we were in school in our biology classes.
1859 was the year Darwin published "On the Origin of Species" which proposes that accidental workings of nature governed by natural selection are the cause for the genetic changes we see in all species today.
For human beings, on an evolutionary stand point, it has been found that our earliest ape relatives, Pliopithecus emerged around 25 million years ago and "evolved" to become Homo sapien
While Sapiens from our previous genetic ancestor Homo sapien Neanderthaliss roughly a 100,000 years ago.
While Sapiens from our previous genetic ancestor Homo sapien Neanderthaliss roughly a 100,000 years ago.
The evidences provided to support this argument are very intriguing to say the least, and sure there is no doubt we humans share upto 98% of our DNA with chimpanzees and a little less with other monkeys, but we also share upto 99% of our DNA with rats, and 50% with bananas. So it can be said that DNA sharing amount is a bad indicator as to if the sharers are related or not. Furthermore, in my point of view, Darwin's theory proposes a very externalized form evolution, regarding only the physical, phenotypical changes. It does not account for the fact that human brain size has doubled over the last 2 million years which is a considerably short time for such a big change to take place, having an effect on our intelligence, thought patterns, technological advancements, creativity and etc.
Official position of mainstream science presents the picture of the past in which humanity started from primitive beginnings, and steadily progressed upward in the development of culture and science, but there is always evidence which challenges this view, there have been findings that show ancient cultures that are evolutionary believed to be primitive have been far more technologically advanced than evolutionists can imagine, this is continually occurring as many archaeologists find artifacts whether it be pottery, tools, airplane models that date back even before the emergence of our first supposed relatives, Pliopithecus.
WHAT?!!? Could this imply that human beings have always co-existed with our supposed ancestors?
Certainly, this should be on the front page of the newspapers or on the telly but these new findings are often repressed by the media and the mainstream scientific community. In his documentary,Hidden History of the Human Race, Michael Cremo challenges Darwinian Evolution strongly. He has also documented 100s of artifacts along with Richard L. Thompson, another archaeologist, that contradict the evolutionary timeline depicted by Darwin or mainstream science today. Here are some examples of archaeological findings that contradict with the conventional evolutionary timeline,
a battery that's 2,000 years old! Known as the Baghdad Battery, this curiosity was found in the ruins of a Parthian village believed to date back to between 248 B.C. and 226 A.D. The device consists of a 5-1/2-inch high clay vessel inside of which was a copper cylinder held in place by asphalt, and inside of that was an oxidized iron rod. Experts who examined it concluded that the device needed only to be filled with an acid or alkaline liquid to produce an electric charge |
Modern Human Skeleton from Tanzania, over 800,000 years old In 1913 Professor Hans Reck, of Berlin University, conducted investigations at Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, then German East Africa.This modern skull is from a fully human skeleton found that year. The human skeletal remains, including this complete skull, were cemented in the rock and had to be chipped with hammers and chisels. It was found in the upper end of a rock bed dated at more than 800,000 years old. |
Mortar and Pestle in California, up to 55 million years oldIn 1877 Mr. J. H. Neale was superintendent of the Montezuma Tunnel Company, and ran the Montezuma tunnel into the gravel underlying the lava of Table Mountain, Tuolumne County |
Metallic Vase from Pre-Cambrian Rock, over 600 Million Years Old The following report, titled "A Relic of a Bygone Age," appeared in the magazine Scientific American (June 5, 1852):According to a recent U.S. Geological Survey map of the Boston-Dorchester area where this was found, the pudding stone, now called the Roxbury conglomerate, is of Precambrian age, over 600 million years old. By standard accounts, life was just beginning to form on this planet during the Precambrian. |
No comments:
Post a Comment